fbyZ9 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

เปรม ป๊อก เหี้ยตาเดียวภูมิพล นางแม่มดอึ่งอ่างสิริกิต์ รวมกันชิงหมาเกิด

pantamit4eva (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

It's the airport authority who ordered the shutdown of the airports, not PAD. The airport could still function well. PAD only obstructed the road outside, while there are four other levels of easy accesses to the airport buildings. PAD did not interfere with the-passengers-officers-secure d zones-airport control. It is the smear of the government on PAD because the Head of the airport authority is a brother-in-law of Weera, the leader of red UDD, a strong supporter of the government and Thaksin

bongo2209 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

i lived many places in the world including the US that was too much like a police state never go there again'but thailand the best country i & my wife has ever been to'its so free and so cool

NingBkk (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

the guy in this video who got interviewed was right!

BLeAm (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

You know what? I'm trying so hard to avoid to appointing you as an idiot, but it seems like I have to give up, since you really are. All PADs were there but Thaksin is the cause of all bad things there? And PAD done all good things? You sick or what!? Your words are just like an excuse of 6 yrs old kid when he has screwed up his parents' things: "No no no, I haven't ruined it, it's Mr. Bogus who has done all bad things.". This kind of action.... I don't know.... moron!?

BLeAm (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

You disapprove? Not surprising me, since you or those PAD never approve any BAD thing that they, the PAD, have done, even to shut off the airport, they (and probably you) always say that they didn't do anything, they just went there and find some comfortable place to sit and chit chat, ridiculously, they never mentioned about airport's security guard and officer that they've against, even though that situation has been taped and world wide broadcast.

brlt21 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

2) - I only suspect a pro-Thaksin, who has penetrated discretely inside the rooms, for doing the degradations, and wanting that every body think that is an act of the PAD. For me, its too easy to conclude that its a PADs act! Today, no body knows for sure.

brlt21 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

1)-I disapprove with those who have broken the furniture inside the rooms of the government house. I dont think that its the PADs spirit to do that. They have been under attacks from the police and the red shirts, causing dead and wounded among the PAD. But PAD never launches retaliation. The PAD counters to the pro-thaksin attacks by practicing self-defense if they can...

Soksabai79 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

LOL Khmer will shut up only Thai thieves get out of the Khmer property.

ning711 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Only those who have gone into the details about Thaksin s skulduggery, can understand PAD s spirit protest movement.